Nestle’s reply: questions unanswered?

As you can see from some of the comments, this was what our team of Rainforest Investigators were wondering after they read Nestle’s reply. Make up your own mind by reading Nestle’s reply (below) and comments from some of the Year 4 Meerkats:

About these ads
This entry was posted in Palm Oil Letters and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Nestle’s reply: questions unanswered?

  1. Tom B says:

    1. They didn’t write about labelling their products ‘forest friendly’.
    2. They actually just talked about information on the letter – they didn’t talk about our letter.
    3. I think they tried to hide the facts about palm oil.
    4. I think they definitely want to cut down the rainforests. :(

  2. Zishaan says:

    They didn’t write anything about labelling their products as forest friendly. Also they gave us lots of information but didn’t put in much answers to our questions. But they were kind and gave us their number and they wrote kindly. But I think they tried to hide some of their facts.

  3. Tom F says:

    1. They didn’t put very much in their letter about what we asked them.
    2. I think they were trying to HIDE the fact that they put palm oil in their products.
    3. I don’t think they label their food forest friendly.
    4. I think they want to destroy the rainforests.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s